Andrew Sharpless: – working with Bloomberg. And then I went away and I thought about a conversation I had had in Geneva with the Ambassador to the World Trade Organization, Mr. He listened to me very respectfully talk about how there were all kinds of measures of serious problems in the ocean.
And it also turned into specific for me how the different portion with the energy really work along to own a broader impression
And then he basically said… you will find good billion members of Asia to pass through. South-west could have been overfishing the oceans for some time. We’ll get our very own turn. And i also kept feeling that i had extremely mishandled the latest fulfilling. Right here, I’d a message that was we may have way more dining from a rich water. I got totally failed to create him understand that end in the guy heard myself giving the types of conventional preservation content which is a significant that but it is simply only about biodiversity defense.
One forced me to discover, really, hold off a moment, we could measure whatever you are doing inside the a logical metric which is the food value of a beneficial rebuilt water, meals capital of rebuilt ocean. Just how many food you will i provide out of a great rebuilt sea? We entitled Bloomberg backup and i also told you, waiting a moment, you will find an alternate idea. And you will let us discuss that it dining, the food metric.
Melissa Wright: You were able to bring back that epiphany and help develop what’s now a 3-country effort around overfishing. And I saw this work in action and in a recent trip to Brazil and was so impressed and inspired. And one of the side trips that we went on when I was in Brazil was to Itajai, and which I understand is one of the largest commercial fishing ports in Brazil.
Andrew Sharpless: They’re surprising big, aren’t they? I mean you – the audience should understand we’re not talking about like two guys in a little, you know, 15-foot skiff.
Melissa Wright: And Monica, the Brazilian rep from Oceana was telling me about how there was a lack of information, now, about what those boats are bringing in, which species, how much, when, and where they’ve been fishing because the country stopped monitoring their landings or their catch a few years ago. Can you speak to what impact that has had on the fisheries in Brazil and the work of Oceana?
Andrew Sharpless: So I’ve taken that same trip with you and it’s very impressive. The scale of our ability to catch ocean fish is enormous. And https://internationalwomen.net/sv/albanska-kvinnor/ you see it as you go down that river and you’ll see these vessels that are stories and stories high – four or five or six stories high. So amazingly Brazil has collected no data on its own fisheries since 2008. Brazil’s had a kind of a budget crisis in that year. One of the ways they saved money was by cancelling all data collection efforts on fishery catches.
Wu
And so using the services of, you are sure that, the people here the audience is today get together landings investigation in an specialized and you may credible ways and you can revealing that upwards. And perhaps they are now event analysis to the about forty% of your own complete fishery catch.
Andrew Sharpless: Yeah. Which is a pretty basic step, we can all see how that starts to set the conditions for, you know, scientific and sensible management. We’ve just launched together with this little enterprise called Google, and Sky Truth, an NGO, is our other partner. It’s called Global Fishing Watch. And your listeners can go to .
