At this time, there exists no legal apparatus not as much as Philippine laws through which an effective Filipino can get safer a splitting up decree up on his or her own step. Properly, it is the Court’s responsibility in order to support particularly policy and apply the law whilst currently really stands before the passing of an enthusiastic amendatory laws about them.
Post 26(2) of one’s Loved ones Code try a different on nationality principle around Article fifteen of your own Civil Code.
Article twenty six(2) are delivered during the group meetings of your Combined Civil Code and you will Family members Law Panel (the brand new Panel) to deal with the end result away from overseas divorce proceedings decrees for the blended marriages ranging from Filipinos and you may foreign people. The latest supply, due to the fact to begin with worded, while the rationale because of its inclusion, appear in this new deliberations:
[Teacher Esteban B. Bautista ( Bautista)]is why position, actually underneath the introduce laws, was that Filipina partner is going to be permitted to remarry once the much time while the breakup holds true in federal legislation of new partner, in which [Legal Alicia Sempio-Do-it-yourself (Legal Doing it yourself)] and [Fairness Leonor Ines-Luciano (Fairness Luciano)] decided.Shortly after then deliberation, [Fairness Ricardo C. Puno (Justice Puno)] advised that they formulate the bottom to afford above state. Court Do-it-yourself and [Fairness Eduardo P. Caguioa (Fairness Caguioa)] developed the base as follows:
Into the a combined relationship anywhere between a great Filipino citizen and you may a non-native, one another capacitated to marry significantly less than Philippine laws, whether your foreigner would be to get a legitimate divorce case abroad, capacitating him to remarry, the latest Filipino spouse should likewise have power to remarry under Philippine laws.
not, subsequent deliberations reveal that this new Panel fundamentally solved so you’re able to erase the fresh new provision and you will delay action up until pure divorce case is decided in future legislation:
Into the Blog post [26(2)], [Justice Jose B.L. Reyes (Fairness Reyes)] mentioned which generally seems to discriminate facing Filipinos, that hitched so you can Filipinos, given that provision governs simply Filipinos partnered so you’re able to people from other countries.
Since the members of the brand new Legal, ours ‘s the obligations to translate the law; it duty doesn’t carry in it the benefit to determine precisely what the law can be when confronted with modifying minutes, and therefore power, therefore, lies entirely in state away from Congress
Fairness Puno recommended you to definitely, relative to Justice Caguioa’s look at you to person they should generate this new Suggested Household members Password because the acceptable to and since they are not touching into the split up that is among the many huge products and are usually leaving they to help you future regulations, they omit Post 126(2)] temporarily BelГ§ika gelinleri and take it after they use up the matter of pure divorce case.
Prof
Bautista remarked that it is a matter of equity, justice and fairness that Article [26(2)] should be retained. On the point raised by Justice Reyes, Bautista opined that there is no unfairness in the case of a Filipino, who is married to a Filipino, because in the case of a Filipino who is married to a foreigner, the foreigner is already free, and yet the Filipino is still married to nobody. [Dean Bartolome S. Carale (Dean Carale)] added that if two Filipinos are married anywhere, they are both covered by the Philippine prohibitory laws because they are nationals of the Philippines. Justice Caguioa, however, pointed out that, in effect, there is preferential treatment in the case of Filipinos married to foreigners, since if the foreigner gets a divorce, the Filipino spouse also automatically gets a divorce. Dean Carale remarked that Article [26(2)] will in effect encourage Filipinos to marry foreigners. Bautista disagreed since it will be the foreigner and not the brand new Filipino, that will find separation and divorce.
Justice Reyes remarked that this article is an implicit detection regarding foreign split up, with which Justice Caguioa concurred. Bautista and [Teacher Flerida Ruth P. Romero ( Romero)] pointed out that this article will simply security outstanding circumstances and you can special situations and that there was a good and reasonable foundation in making they an exception to this rule.
In which a marriage ranging from a good Filipino citizen and you will a non-native is actually validly prominent abroad and you may a separation try after that validly gotten abroad capacitating such as for instance non-native to help you remarry, the brand new Filipino partner should also have power to remarry significantly less than Philippine laws.
